Behind the Rhetoric: How to Evaluate Candidates
Elections are full of promises, slogans and carefully crafted messaging. But how do you cut through the noise and figure out who is actually prepared to do the job? Here are some things worth considering.
Elections are full of promises, slogans and carefully crafted messaging. But how do you cut through the noise and figure out who is actually prepared to do the job? Here are some things worth considering.
What to Look For in a Candidate
Do they understand how municipal government actually works?
Municipal councils operate within a specific legal and administrative framework. Councillors work with staff, follow procedural bylaws, and make decisions within the scope of municipal authority. A candidate who does not understand this — or who promises things that are outside a council's jurisdiction — may not be ready for the role.
Are they specific, or just vague?
Anyone can say they want "lower taxes," "better roads" or "more transparency." The question is: how? What is their actual plan? What trade-offs are they willing to make? Vague promises are easy to make and impossible to hold anyone accountable for.
Have they done their homework?
Good councillors come prepared. They read the agenda, ask questions, understand the issues and make decisions based on evidence — not just instinct or ideology. Has the candidate demonstrated that they have taken the time to understand the issues facing the municipality?
Are they focused on the community, or on a single issue?
Single-issue candidates can be passionate advocates, but council members need to deal with a wide range of issues — roads, budgets, land use, services, economic development and more. Is this candidate prepared to engage with all of it?
How do they handle disagreement?
Council decisions are made collectively. That means working with people you may not always agree with. A candidate who seems unable to consider other perspectives, or who responds to questions with hostility or deflection, may struggle in a collaborative environment.
What is their track record?
For incumbents, look at what they have actually done — not just what they say they have done. Have they been present and engaged? Have they followed through on commitments? For new candidates, look at their background, community involvement and demonstrated judgment.
Questions Worth Asking
At all-candidates meetings or in conversations with candidates, consider asking:
- What specific issue do you think the municipality has handled poorly, and what would you have done differently?
- What is one thing you would prioritize in the first year, and how would you approach it?
- How do you make decisions when you do not have all the information you need?
- Can you describe a time you changed your mind based on new information?
- How would you handle a situation where you disagree with the majority of Council?
Why This Matters
Municipal government affects daily life in ways that often go unnoticed — until something goes wrong. Roads, drainage, land use, local services, emergency response, economic development: these are not abstract issues. They are the things that shape whether a community works well for the people who live in it.
The people you elect to Council will make decisions that affect your taxes, your property, your services and your community's future. They deserve your scrutiny.
Do not just vote for the name you recognize or the slogan that sounds good. Take the time to evaluate who is actually prepared to do the work.
Your community is worth it.
Explore Topics
Written by
Cindy Kellendonk
Municipal Councillor, RM of Lac du Bonnet.